man i need a ps3 but i just bought a psp over the summer so im gonna have to wait a long time before getting a ps3 or maybe they gonna make a wii hd =)
i have obvo«ivion for 360 and the game of the year ediction for PS3 i have fallout for the PS3 also.
for Xbox i have only 3 games
for 360 about 10-15
for playstation(1,2, & 3) more than 200 in total(all original nope copied)
so for me is normal to be more acostume to the PS controller but i dont dislike the xbox one.
both are amaginz consonles no douth about it
a for online i cant say a dont use net on neither console only on my PC
I dont get why people are still bothered about this BC has been gone for years it was only in the launch models then they took it out, took away 2 usb ports and the sd card readers too.
Why buy a PS3 to play PS2 games anyway? You wouldnt buy a dreamcast to play mega cd games
looks crap as hell, when sony demands so much money for their console with currently so few killer titles id like to know im paying for some heavy and crammed hardware which shines like a mirror and not something that looks like a psp battery
as for bacwards compatibilty i would have liked to be able to use atleast my PS2 titles as its always harder to get rid of games rather than a old hardware, not everyone wants to have consoles at home you only take out occasionaly to play a scroll shooter
you always have a bigger bond to games than consoles, only hardcore people ollects consoles and yet probably use them for a week in a year, so yes backwards compatibilty is important and should pretty much be standard by now, its really annoying as im hesitant on buying one as i dont see good enough titles for it, and i want to buy the Ratchet & Clank games i missed on PS2 for it to get me going with a PS3 as i like those games, but sony says no
Ok even if the new ps3 did have backwards compability. You still wouldn’t buy it because of the simple fact that its “ugly”….so why bother commenting?????
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Well we cant discuss this one….
actually it is a bit thinner than Xbox but it sure is wider. So almost the same….
and the height is the same….
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Well neither do I.
I have always thought that PC is with OS and consoles are PCs without it – only for gaming….
I really dont know why did they put OS into PS3, but now they have cut it, so its little bit funny.
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
i think is ugly!!!! i like my old ps3 better
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
man i need a ps3 but i just bought a psp over the summer so im gonna have to wait a long time before getting a ps3 or maybe they gonna make a wii hd =)
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
it doesn’t look that much smaller.
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
theres is no need for slimmer ones when the bigger is just as good
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
new give away contest!! Click on me!
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
i have obvo«ivion for 360 and the game of the year ediction for PS3 i have fallout for the PS3 also.
for Xbox i have only 3 games
for 360 about 10-15
for playstation(1,2, & 3) more than 200 in total(all original nope copied)
so for me is normal to be more acostume to the PS controller but i dont dislike the xbox one.
both are amaginz consonles no douth about it
a for online i cant say a dont use net on neither console only on my PC
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
i’m buying the ps3 slim next year and psp slim in december…
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
No backwards comparability huh….>>
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
There is a need cos its cheaper to make the new slimmer one then the old phat one so from a manufacturing stand point it makes perfect sense.
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
I dont get why people are still bothered about this BC has been gone for years it was only in the launch models then they took it out, took away 2 usb ports and the sd card readers too.
Why buy a PS3 to play PS2 games anyway? You wouldnt buy a dreamcast to play mega cd games
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
does it come with a game ?
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
I Perfer The “Fat” PS3
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Didnt u get 2 controllers for the Old PS3
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
the new ps3 looks so cheap.
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
looks like a mod of the ps2 slim
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
looks crap as hell, when sony demands so much money for their console with currently so few killer titles id like to know im paying for some heavy and crammed hardware which shines like a mirror and not something that looks like a psp battery
as for bacwards compatibilty i would have liked to be able to use atleast my PS2 titles as its always harder to get rid of games rather than a old hardware, not everyone wants to have consoles at home you only take out occasionaly to play a scroll shooter
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
you always have a bigger bond to games than consoles, only hardcore people ollects consoles and yet probably use them for a week in a year, so yes backwards compatibilty is important and should pretty much be standard by now, its really annoying as im hesitant on buying one as i dont see good enough titles for it, and i want to buy the Ratchet & Clank games i missed on PS2 for it to get me going with a PS3 as i like those games, but sony says no
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
fuuuuck you fanboy noob, your sister plays wii with yous and you eating her out yah
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
would buy a consolethat looks like shit?
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
da slim ps3 is ugly, perfer da regular size ps3
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Yeah and sony is good about “cramming” software, but unlike the xbox the playstation still keeps functioning no matter how much you play
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Ok even if the new ps3 did have backwards compability. You still wouldn’t buy it because of the simple fact that its “ugly”….so why bother commenting?????
September 12th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
dam, if u buy the new one, does that mean all your game saved memory will b gone?